Post by Anonymous on Feb 7, 2017 14:00:30 GMT -5
Does government have the right to harm, torture civilians or do we really have rights or freedom?
-There are many controversies facing ethical standards of electronic monitoring, surveillance, privacy rights, which are unconstitutional, unreasonable, not normal or usual to common law in reference to protect society as a whole. I will illustrate the facts from a primary source of reality what they did to my life behind closed doors. This resulted in financial devastation, constantly disrupting my life, punitively taking money, my time and energy for their entitlements. This was done in conjunction with the aid of administrative power. Who have influence to sabotage the targeted individuals. Which had authority to criminalize, scam, interrupt continuously and stalk 24/7. This has caused me a financial hardship, mental and emotional stress because I was singled out regularly. This is a breach of the law of trust, faith and promise to abide to The Bill of Rights, to legislation or a follow amendments, bill of rights and to the sole purpose of a justice system. I have warrant of evidence, ground and proof of my allegation that I can support my cause. What power gives allowance to conduct unfair, unethical, unregulated actions to purposely cheat and defraud a honest hard working woman? I will present and illustrate a pattern of gradual trapping that grew excessively to punitively punish take time, energy and by monetarily means. Then to target frequently by a method called gang stalking electronically which is monitored, watched through surveillance. For the simple fact they can. This is a scientific study of non consensual agreement that is a tremendous out rage to the human race. This is a misrepresentation of the law and ethics.
Human Rights are the sole purpose of life in existence. These are the following rights that have caused personal injury to my good name. I was oblivious like most of us because we believe we are protected by people in power.
—Fourth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. A type of search which has been frequently tested for potential violation of constitutional rights is the use of electronic surveillance. In that instance, a bifurcated framework has been used to analyze which acts of surveillance constitute illegal searches. This approach considers first the implications of the attachment of the surveillance device and second the implications of continual monitoring once a device is in place.[87] These considerations must also take into account the requirements of probable cause and particularity.[88]
There must be a definite reason for suspicion necessitating the search, and the search must also be placed within finite limits. In this section, a search will first be defined, then the method of determination of whether or not a search is constitutional will be explained, and finally the applicability to microchip implantation will be explored.
-Amendment VIII Bail, fines, punishment Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
-The 9th Amendment Rights not enumerated in the Constitution. The enumerated powers are a list of items found in Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution that set forth the authority of Congress.[1] In summary, Congress may exercise the powers that the Constitution grants it, subject to the individual rights listed in the Bill of Rights. Moreover, the Constitution expresses various other limitations on Congress, such as the one expressed by the Tenth Amendment: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” Historically, Congress and the Supreme Court have broadly interpreted the enumerated powers, especially by deriving many implied powers from them.[2] The enumerated powers listed in Article One include both exclusive federal powers, as well as concurrent powers that are shared with the states, and all of those powers are to be contrasted with reserved powers that only the states possess.[3][4
-29th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States
The following amendment to the Constitution is proposed to preserve and protect the standard of living and quality of life in America from the effects of overpopulation. It explicitly precludes a dependence on the rest of the world for natural resources and requires an environmentally sustainable population. It does not preclude the consideration of other factors, such as labor force size, productivity, thereafter.
My Concerns
I am addressing a serious situation that are conducted by people in government. A lawsuit can be the effect of long time endurance of mental cruelty, financial burden caused by bureaucrats that injured me emotionally, mentally and financially. A regime which defrauded, me and my family. this was done by illegal monitoring, tracking, trapping me inside a system that did not allow me to live because they kept taking and milking me for every penny that I earned. This complaint that Jana, seek(s) damages or equitable relief from one or more stated defendants, local and US government. I was targeted beyond belief by ruthless tactics and picking on me constantly. I was trapped excessively to pay fines, fees, time which imposed on my freedom mostly my rights. According to the 29th Amendment, I was not protected because I paid beyond the call of duty as a citizen. In reference, to adhere to Article 1 section 8 to preserve individuals the standard of a quality of life in America. I was impacted severely because I was taken beyond livelihood to be subjected to constant victimization. Furthermore, to be stalked 24/7 by electronic devises, harass and invade my space and privacy rights. Further, to monitor by surveillance, use chemicals, energy to exploit me behind the scenes. This information is based on a primary source of factual claim. For three decades, I was taken advantage of normal limits as a citizens or an immigrant. I can present patterns of abusive tactics which injured my reputation. I was involved in a credit scam for a decade that was able to take, watch and exceed acceptable limits. Along with regular traffic citations for 32 years and escalated because I was singled out and stuck in a racket. This has affected my family, employers because as an employee I was stressed, drained emotionally, mentally and took off of work on a regular basis to go to court for 32 years. The actual cost of time, money and damage to my good name. For the fact that the Judicial System could not stop taking from my pocket book. For the simple fact because they can. To gain maximum trafficking dollars from those who are responsible but blind to racketeering, kickbacks and gainful profits called criminals. An organized regime which super cedes the law of ethics and rights to live life accordingly
-There are many controversies facing ethical standards of electronic monitoring, surveillance, privacy rights, which are unconstitutional, unreasonable, not normal or usual to common law in reference to protect society as a whole. I will illustrate the facts from a primary source of reality what they did to my life behind closed doors. This resulted in financial devastation, constantly disrupting my life, punitively taking money, my time and energy for their entitlements. This was done in conjunction with the aid of administrative power. Who have influence to sabotage the targeted individuals. Which had authority to criminalize, scam, interrupt continuously and stalk 24/7. This has caused me a financial hardship, mental and emotional stress because I was singled out regularly. This is a breach of the law of trust, faith and promise to abide to The Bill of Rights, to legislation or a follow amendments, bill of rights and to the sole purpose of a justice system. I have warrant of evidence, ground and proof of my allegation that I can support my cause. What power gives allowance to conduct unfair, unethical, unregulated actions to purposely cheat and defraud a honest hard working woman? I will present and illustrate a pattern of gradual trapping that grew excessively to punitively punish take time, energy and by monetarily means. Then to target frequently by a method called gang stalking electronically which is monitored, watched through surveillance. For the simple fact they can. This is a scientific study of non consensual agreement that is a tremendous out rage to the human race. This is a misrepresentation of the law and ethics.
Human Rights are the sole purpose of life in existence. These are the following rights that have caused personal injury to my good name. I was oblivious like most of us because we believe we are protected by people in power.
—Fourth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. A type of search which has been frequently tested for potential violation of constitutional rights is the use of electronic surveillance. In that instance, a bifurcated framework has been used to analyze which acts of surveillance constitute illegal searches. This approach considers first the implications of the attachment of the surveillance device and second the implications of continual monitoring once a device is in place.[87] These considerations must also take into account the requirements of probable cause and particularity.[88]
There must be a definite reason for suspicion necessitating the search, and the search must also be placed within finite limits. In this section, a search will first be defined, then the method of determination of whether or not a search is constitutional will be explained, and finally the applicability to microchip implantation will be explored.
-Amendment VIII Bail, fines, punishment Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
-The 9th Amendment Rights not enumerated in the Constitution. The enumerated powers are a list of items found in Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution that set forth the authority of Congress.[1] In summary, Congress may exercise the powers that the Constitution grants it, subject to the individual rights listed in the Bill of Rights. Moreover, the Constitution expresses various other limitations on Congress, such as the one expressed by the Tenth Amendment: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” Historically, Congress and the Supreme Court have broadly interpreted the enumerated powers, especially by deriving many implied powers from them.[2] The enumerated powers listed in Article One include both exclusive federal powers, as well as concurrent powers that are shared with the states, and all of those powers are to be contrasted with reserved powers that only the states possess.[3][4
-29th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States
The following amendment to the Constitution is proposed to preserve and protect the standard of living and quality of life in America from the effects of overpopulation. It explicitly precludes a dependence on the rest of the world for natural resources and requires an environmentally sustainable population. It does not preclude the consideration of other factors, such as labor force size, productivity, thereafter.
My Concerns
I am addressing a serious situation that are conducted by people in government. A lawsuit can be the effect of long time endurance of mental cruelty, financial burden caused by bureaucrats that injured me emotionally, mentally and financially. A regime which defrauded, me and my family. this was done by illegal monitoring, tracking, trapping me inside a system that did not allow me to live because they kept taking and milking me for every penny that I earned. This complaint that Jana, seek(s) damages or equitable relief from one or more stated defendants, local and US government. I was targeted beyond belief by ruthless tactics and picking on me constantly. I was trapped excessively to pay fines, fees, time which imposed on my freedom mostly my rights. According to the 29th Amendment, I was not protected because I paid beyond the call of duty as a citizen. In reference, to adhere to Article 1 section 8 to preserve individuals the standard of a quality of life in America. I was impacted severely because I was taken beyond livelihood to be subjected to constant victimization. Furthermore, to be stalked 24/7 by electronic devises, harass and invade my space and privacy rights. Further, to monitor by surveillance, use chemicals, energy to exploit me behind the scenes. This information is based on a primary source of factual claim. For three decades, I was taken advantage of normal limits as a citizens or an immigrant. I can present patterns of abusive tactics which injured my reputation. I was involved in a credit scam for a decade that was able to take, watch and exceed acceptable limits. Along with regular traffic citations for 32 years and escalated because I was singled out and stuck in a racket. This has affected my family, employers because as an employee I was stressed, drained emotionally, mentally and took off of work on a regular basis to go to court for 32 years. The actual cost of time, money and damage to my good name. For the fact that the Judicial System could not stop taking from my pocket book. For the simple fact because they can. To gain maximum trafficking dollars from those who are responsible but blind to racketeering, kickbacks and gainful profits called criminals. An organized regime which super cedes the law of ethics and rights to live life accordingly
